Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Ocean | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's general score of 83.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, providing you some additional features. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's design is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, although they were released with only 5 months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better display than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a bit larger display and a higher pixels density. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way better resolution back camera, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.