Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Ocean | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's global score of 83.1. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it is a little bit heavier.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 3168 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a processor that is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Pro one, they have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor taking lot lower quality videos and photos and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 17% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.