Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Ocean | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's general score of 83.1. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a just a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a little bit lower 1440 x 3088 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a lot brighter screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos in low-light situations, it also counts with a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.