Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-14 | -- |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Ocean | -- |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S25, with an 83.1 score against 82.6. Both of these devices include Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much powerful processor than Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a little bit better looking display than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with much more screen brightness.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, it also counts with a back camera with a higher 50 megapixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.