Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Ocean | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. OPPO Find X2 Pro's construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's also heavier. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a much larger display. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and higher 60 fps video frame rates. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 7% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.