Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ocean | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy S8 Active, with an 83.1 score against 81.9. The OPPO Find X2 Pro design is way newer, somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy S8 Active. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a little worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rate, a lot higher resolution camera and a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.