Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Ocean | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a global score of 83.3 against 83.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S9 is incredibly older than OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's design is just a little thinner and a lot lighter. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit superior processor than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a quite worse pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a bigger display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a much bigger sensor.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.