Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ocean | Black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a general score of 83.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's score of 81. These phones come with Android operating system, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a just a little lighter and thinner device than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were only released 3 months apart.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a bit bigger display and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.