Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Ocean | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's global score of 83.1. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only 4 months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is much heavier but much thinner. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a greater number of pixels per inch in the display. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Pro. They have 8 processing cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4260mAh. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.