Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Ocean | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a general score of 83.1, which is slightly better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's global score of 76.1. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact OPPO Find X2 Pro is older and a little heavier than TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's body is still just a bit thinner.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a brighter display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, faster video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has just 256 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.