Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Ocean | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, with an 86.6 score against 83.1. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a somewhat thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Pro. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a better number of pixels per inch of display.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments and a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.