Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Ocean | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a overall score of 90.7 against 83.1. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with a couple additional features. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a newer and a little bit thinner phone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, although it is heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a bit sharper display than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display, way more brightness and a quite better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes just a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a way smaller sensor shooting lot worse quality images and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a camera with more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features improved battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.