Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.10 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue and Purple |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 83.2 score against 83.1. Xiaomi Mi 9's body is lighter and thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even though it was released only 14 months before. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a little larger display, a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, more screen brightness and a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen. Xiaomi Mi 9's camera is very similar to OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9 has a smaller camera aperture and a way smaller sensor giving a much worse image quality, they both have the same (4K) video definition, a 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.