Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Ocean | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a general score of 83.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi A3's score of 79.2. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11. The OPPO Find X2 Pro design is newer than the Xiaomi Mi A3's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way better display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a way better amount of pixels per display inch, a much higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little bigger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster video frame rate, a much larger sensor taking lot better quality photos and a larger aperture for better low-light photography.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a very superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity instead of 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.