Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Ocean | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F3 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having an 87.3 score against 83.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F3 has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. Xiaomi Poco F3's construction is newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has way darker display, and they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a greater display density.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution back facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a much larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.