Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Ocean | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with an 83.1 score against 81.6. Both phones we are comparing here have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Even though OPPO Find X2 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC were released only 4 months apart, OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way brighter display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a higher display pixels density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's camera is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Pro one, because although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a tinier aperture, a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality photos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.