Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Ocean | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a general score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's general score of 81.1. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a just a bit lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should count with all the same OS features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a better pixels density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's camera is just as good as the camera in OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.