Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with an 83.1 score against 79. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a just a bit lighter device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but they are 0.35inches thick. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 48 mega-pixels camera in the back, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos, a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features improved battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has an 18 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.