Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Ocean | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the OPPO Find X2, getting an 88.1 score against 79.7. Although the iPhone X is much older than OPPO Find X2, it's construction is just a little thinner and just a little lighter. The Apple iPhone X has just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The OPPO Find X2 has a slightly better looking screen than iPhone X, because it has a just a little better screen pixels density, a brighter display, a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px. Apple iPhone X counts with as much storage capacity to install games and applications as the OPPO Find X2 one, both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 takes much better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.