Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2, having an 80 score against 79.7. The Google Pixel 3 construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2, but it's notably lighter. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a much better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bigger screen, a little higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
OPPO Find X2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X2 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.