Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a 79.7 score against 78.8. The OPPO Find X2 body is newer and a little thinner, but a lot heavier than Google Pixel 3a. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X2 has the previous 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a little more pixels per display inch and a bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X2 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light situations, a lot more MP back facing camera, a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X2 features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.