Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 519 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 is a little bit better than the HTC U11, with a 79.7 score against 77.6. The OPPO Find X2 body has the same thickness than HTC U11, but it's just a bit heavier. OPPO Find X2 counts with just a little better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 features a little bit better screen than HTC U11, because although it has a bit inferior pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. OPPO Find X2 takes much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, faster video frame rate and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos.
OPPO Find X2 has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a much better battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.