Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, getting a score of 81 against 79.7. The LG G7 ThinQ body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2, but it's lighter. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, providing you some additional features.
OPPO Find X2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3120px, it also counts with a little more brightness and a little bit better screen pixels density.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a greater storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 shoots much better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a way better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 40% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.