Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2, having a global score of 84.3 against 79.7. The LG G8 ThinQ is an older and a bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2, but LG could make it lighter anyway. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X2 and the LG G8 ThinQ both feature similar displays, because although the LG G8 ThinQ has a bit smaller screen, much lower brightness and a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 3120, it also counts with a little better screen pixels density. LG G8 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X2 has a bit better performance than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 features a better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with greater battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 20 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.