Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ocean | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version. The LG V30S ThinQ is an notably older cellphone than the OPPO Find X2, but LG was able to build it a little thinner and lighter.
OPPO Find X2 has a bit more powerful CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a slightly better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
OPPO Find X2 shoots better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X2 has improved battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.