Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ocean | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than OPPO Find X2, with an 81.3 score against 79.7. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than OPPO Find X2, but it is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X2 has a little faster CPU than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 features a slightly better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a little larger display. OPPO Find X2 shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X2 has improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.