Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is older than the OPPO Find X2, it's design is a little thinner and a little bit lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS. OPPO Find X2 has just a bit better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The OPPO Find X2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X2 takes much clearer photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
OPPO Find X2 features greater battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.