Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than OPPO Find X2, having a global score of 87.1 against 79.7. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2, but it is a little bit lighter. OPPO Find X2 has a little faster processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 has a much better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and more pixels per inch in the display. OPPO Find X2 has a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same video quality and a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.