Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ocean | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 has a general score of 79.7, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. OPPO Find X2's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S, although both were released only a couple months apart. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit faster processor than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 counts with a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better pixels amount in each inch of screen, more brightness and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The OPPO Find X2 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S captures slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.