Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 general score. Both of these devices use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give you very similar OS features. Galaxy A50s's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Find X2, even when both were only released 7 months apart.
OPPO Find X2 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a quite bigger screen and a higher pixels count in each inch in the display.
The OPPO Find X2 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution back camera, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X2 has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.