Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2, having a score of 85.5 against 79.7. Galaxy A51's design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X2, but it's a little lighter. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features and performance enhancements.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A51, because it has a little larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a greater display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, a back facing camera with a 48 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments and faster video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.