Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Ocean | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is better than OPPO Find X2's global score of 79.7. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. Galaxy A52s's body is newer, but a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X2.
The OPPO Find X2 features a better display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a better screen pixel density and a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and video and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.