Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, getting an 87.5 score against 79.7. Although the Galaxy A71 and the OPPO Find X2 were released only 3 months apart, the Galaxy A71 is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better pixel amount in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. OPPO Find X2 features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 takes just a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A71 features a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.