Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 overall score. Even being the best device in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also a just a bit heavier and a bit thicker device. These phones come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 has a sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW captures clearer videos and photos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.