Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Ocean | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is better than the OPPO Find X2's global score of 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than the OPPO Find X2, we must note that it is also a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 features a much better display than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a little bit more storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 has a way better battery life than OPPO Find X2, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.