Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Ocean | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than the OPPO Find X2's global score of 79.7. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Even being the best in this review, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker device than the OPPO Find X2.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X2. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. OPPO Find X2 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels in each screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution, a much better video quality and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.