Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a noticeably older and just a little thicker phone than OPPO Find X2, but Samsung was able to build it lighter anyway. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has more pixels per display inch, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a larger screen. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. OPPO Find X2 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a much larger aperture to capture better low light captures, a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.