Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Ocean | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 has a score of 83, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2's global score of 79.7. Even being the best phone in this review, it must be told that it's also older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, offering lots of additional features and better performance.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a little bit worse pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X2 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.