Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Ocean | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the OPPO Find X2, having a score of 93.6 against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2, but it is a bit heavier. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, offering a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a little better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. The Galaxy S10 5G's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 one, both have equal 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.