Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Ocean | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 general score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than the OPPO Find X2, it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and way more brightness. OPPO Find X2 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much better 108 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.