Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Ocean | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a global score of 81.7, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a somewhat lighter phone than OPPO Find X2, but both are 0.31inches thick. The OPPO Find X2 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S8, because although it has a little lower pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. OPPO Find X2 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.