Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Ocean | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X2's general score of 79.7. Galaxy S9's body is somewhat lighter than the OPPO Find X2, but it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before. OPPO Find X2 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a bit lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a bigger display. OPPO Find X2 counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a way better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.