Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Ocean | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 519 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2, having a overall score of 80.1 against 79.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is heavier and notably thicker than the OPPO Find X2.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a much larger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a way better (4K) video quality and a lot bigger sensor.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.