Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ocean | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2's general score of 79.7. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the OPPO Find X2, even when both of them were only released 3 months apart. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and optimized performance.
OPPO Find X2 has a better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better processing power than OPPO Find X2, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
OPPO Find X2 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with way more MP and a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to OPPO Find X2's one, they have equal internal memory. OPPO Find X2 has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 27 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.