Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Ocean | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is somewhat thinner but much heavier than OPPO Find X2, and both of them were released only a few months apart. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, so it provides the user some extra features.
OPPO Find X2 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X2. They have 12 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to OPPO Find X2's one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better battery life than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh. The OPPO Find X2 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography in low light situations and a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.