Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Ocean | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2, with an 81.6 score against 79.7. Although it's the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's design is thicker and somewhat heavier than OPPO Find X2. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a greater pixel count in each inch of screen and way more brightness. OPPO Find X2 has a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures a little bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
The OPPO Find X2 features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.