Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a 93.3 score against 74.1. The iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and OPPO Find X3 Lite works with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro construction is somewhat heavier but just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, and both were released with only 5 months difference.
IPhone 13 Pro has a better hardware performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 13 Pro features just a bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch, a really brighter display and a little bit higher 1170 x 2532px resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the OPPO Find X3 Lite one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a much better battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3095mAh.
The iPhone 13 Pro costs a lot more money than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.