Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, with an 87.1 score against 74.1. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone 8 Plus is notably older and somewhat heavier than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's design is still a little thinner. IPhone 8 Plus has just a bit better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a bit brighter display, a larger display, a just a bit better pixel number in each inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back camera with much more MP and a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus costs a lot more money than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.