Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's overall score of 74.1. The iPhone X is a incredibly older and a little bit heavier phone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but Apple managed to make it a little thinner anyway. Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and 2 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone X has just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little opaque display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount in each display inch and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The OPPO Find X3 Lite takes better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a much higher resolution back camera.
IPhone X has a way bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a much better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone X costs a lot more than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.