Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 82 score against 74.1. Apple iPhone XR's design is way older, a bit thicker and heavier than OPPO Find X3 Lite. IPhone XR has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little more vivid display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a better pixels quantity per screen inch, a bit more screen brightness and a little bit bigger display. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a very superior battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 2942mAh.
The iPhone XR costs more money than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.